 |
|
THIS IS A MESSAGE
Strength
I'm still facing people arguing with this. Read through it carefully people, a lot of the time things are just misread and people are jumping to wild conclusions about what I'm saying. If I was saying 'A big muscle is a good muscle', or 'big muscles are needed for a fighting environment.' I would understand the waves of people disagreeing with me, but the fact is that I don't say that, all it shows me are that people are more than willing to rush into arguments without READING WHAT I'VE WRITTEN
Everyone gives me different information on this junk. Everyone else on the internet will probably deny this strictly. Why do people have such different opinions? Okay, I'll tell you why, because they think that if their method is right, the results (Their own strength) must also be right. Literally the bigger the muscle the stronger it is, if you're not registering that fact go to another website and take your amazing magical muscles somewhere else, shmuck. And again, if you have 28 inch biceps I can imagine that being a problem too, but that's a stupid example. My point here is that there is a balance between having a muscle which is too big to move with the body of two small to move the body itself. People that think that small muscles are always better are just part of this 'great, I don't have to actually do anything' mentality. If you go NUTS with muscle growth, then your muscle will loose functionality. But that's unlikely without crazy drugs and steroids etc. I don't want any lame discussions on how to make a muscle small and strong, that simply doesn't happen. You can have LESS FAT and a good muscle, but not a small powerful muscle. Who invented that whole thing anyway? It's naive and illogical. My muscles are TINY, I accept that it makes me weaker, other people just can't seem to. Ah well. There are advantages for small muscles, but they are not stronger. I'll get to that later. Basically muscles need some kind of stimulus and then they'll grow later on when they're resting, therefore there are two important sides to muscle training. During the exercise and during resting. The chief exercise for building muscles is in lifting weights. It's the quickest, but at a lot of the time muscles can't be trained efficiently using weights because of positioning etc. The way to efficiently train a single muscle is to find an exercise that isolates it's movements, so it does work without the help of other muscles. This is pretty much impossible seeing as other muscles will start to help naturally as the one that you're focusing on will inevitably get tired. It doesn't really matter. Who cares? As long the muscle that you initially wanted to train gets a good run for it's money who cares? WHO CARES!? A fact that I want to bring up is that your own body will tell you when it's had enough, and then you should use your own judgement to whether you want to stop or not. There is an obvious point is most exercises when repetitions become harder and the muscle can't do as much, I usually stop shortly after that. ABDOMINALS Another stupid thing that everyone seems to have a different opinion of, (For no reason). Look at the facts: - The main '6' of the abdominals are all one muscle, given the appearance of division by some tendent or something -There is no way of only training part of a muscle, the muscle will grow entirely or not at all. -A lot of the time people mistake the strain on the hip flexors as a strain on the lower abs. -Everyone already has a good set of abs underneath the FAT. There we have it folks. If you want a six pack loose the fat. And then if you want to work on the abs to get even more definition (You smug bastard.) then you can build the abdominals all in one go. Easy. But here's an interesting point. A quick and long lasting (But unhealthy) way to lose weight is through gaining muscle. This speeds up your metabolism rate (The rate that you burn fat whilst resting.) Aerobic exercises are important too, but for direct burning of fat and for building healthy heart and lungs, which are good. OTHER MUSCLES You don't need help on other muscles. They're not as complicated. FUNCTIONALITY OF MUSCLES Here we are, muscles can get too big and therefore block the natural movements of limbs and stuff. Plus we have a system of protagonist and antagonistic movement, meaning when one muscle relaxes the muscle that would bring the opposite movement must relax as much as possible. A good ratio between muscles is needed to maintain efficiency of movement. If you're looking for a stronger punch look at all of the muscles involved. It is much more than just the triceps and bicep. A strong wrist and forearm give a firmer fist which will deliver more force when hit against something, and reduce the damage to your wrist on every hit. God damn, just think about these things. Nobody on the internet will give you much help, they'll give you opinion. This is all what I think, and what I practice, but that doesn't mean that it's perfect. Take the bits that you agree with and make up your own mind. GOODNIGHT SEATTLE I LOVE YOU
